PNG vs WebP: Which Image Format Should You Use?

PNG is a lossless web staple; WebP is a modern format that is usually smaller at the same quality. Here is how they compare and which to use.

Feature PNG WebP
Compression Lossless only Lossy and lossless
Transparency Yes Yes
Typical file size Larger 25–35% smaller
Animation No Yes
Browser support Universal All modern browsers
Best for Masters, max compatibility Production web delivery

The key difference

Both formats are lossless-capable and both support transparency, so the deciding factor is size and purpose. WebP adds a lossy mode and consistently produces smaller files than PNG at equivalent quality, which makes it the better choice for delivering images on the web. PNG remains valuable as an editable, lossless master and as the safe fallback for any environment that cannot read WebP.

Which should you use?

Use WebP for almost all web images — it loads faster and keeps transparency. Keep PNG as your source/master file, or when a tool, email client or legacy system requires it. Converting your existing PNGs to WebP is one of the easiest site-speed wins available.

Frequently asked questions

For web delivery, usually yes — WebP files are 25–35% smaller at equivalent quality and still support transparency. PNG stays useful as a lossless master and for maximum compatibility.

Yes. WebP supports full alpha transparency, so transparent backgrounds are preserved when converting from PNG.

Use PNG as an editable master, for guaranteed compatibility with older software, or when a system cannot accept WebP.